On January 20, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order addressing last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision, which held that Title VII prohibited employers from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The Bostock decision did not explicitly state that the legal reasoning applied under Title IX as well. As you may know, Title IX is a federal law that prohibits educational institutions that receive federal funds from discriminating on the basis of sex. Under the previous administration, the Department of Education ultimately took the position that it would not apply the reasoning of Bostock in the Title IX context.
President Biden’s executive order made the issue much clearer, stating that under Bostock’s reasoning, Title IX and its implementing regulations prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, so long as the laws do not contain sufficient indications to the contrary.
The executive order further instructs federal agencies administering statutes or regulations that prohibit sex discrimination, such as the Department of Education, to consider in the next 100 days whether new guidance documents need to be issued or regulations need to be revised to comply with this new order.
This executive order further states that “children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports.” Therefore, it is anticipated that the Department of Education will be issuing guidance in line with guidance previously issued by the Obama Administration, which stated that students have the right to participate in athletics and sex-segregated activities and facilities consistent with their gender identity.
It is important to note that California law currently prevents gender discrimination. California Education Code section 220 states that “No person shall be subjected to discrimination on the basis…gender, gender identity, gender expression…in any program or activity conducted by an educational institution that receives, or benefits from, state financial assistance or enrolls pupils who receive state student financial aid.”
In addition, in 2016, the Office of the General Counsel for the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office issued a letter stating “if a California community college is notified that a student is asserting a gender different from the gender listed on their education record, the college must allow the transgender student to access facilities, such as restrooms and locker rooms, consistent with their gender identity.” Therefore, this executive order, practically speaking, does not and should not affect the protections under state law (as interpreted by the Chancellor’s Office) already afforded to students based on their gender identity and sexual orientation, but it does clarify that investigations be conducted in accord with Title IX processes for such complaints.
This office will keep you updated on any subsequent guidance issued as a result of this executive order.
Please contact our office with questions regarding this Legal Update or any other legal matter.
The information in this Legal Update is provided as a summary of law and is not intended as legal advice. Application of the law may vary depending on the particular facts and circumstances at issue. We, therefore, recommend that you consult legal counsel to advise you on how the law applies to your specific situation.
© 2021 School and College Legal Services of California
All rights reserved. However, SCLS grants permission to any current SCLS client to use, reproduce, and distribute this Legal Update in its entirety for the client’s own non-commercial purposes.
 Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).